This thesis aimed to know and examine the authority from the customary court in solving the land dispute of labe pura, to know and examine factors become obstacles of the customary court to in solving the land dispute of labe pura, as well as to know and examine the efforts to reinforce the authority and status of the customary law of Gianyar in solving the land dispute of labe pura. The method used in the research was empirical law research, and used law sociological approach and politic of law. The research results showed that the authority from the customary law in solving the land disputer if labe pura was set in Article 18b of UUD 1945, Article 1 of the Law of RI No. 6 year of 2014 on Village, and Regional Regulation of Bali No. 3 year of 2003 on Pakraman Village. The obstacles faced by the customary court in solving the land dispute of labe pura was the existed awig-awig which had been registered in Regional Regulation of Province Bali, and when it would be conducted the settlement of the dispute by the customer court one of the party who disputed never held pakraman (deliberation). This became a main obstacle by the customary court to solve the land dispute of labe pura. The efforts to reinforce the customary law in solving the dispute was the need for a change in Regional Regulation No. 3 year of 2003 on Pakraman Village, that was awig-awig should not be registered on the Regional Regulation No. 3 year of 2003 on Pakraman Village, because awig-awig was a living law, and the ruling of the customary court can no longer be submitted to the state courts.
Keywords: Authority reinforcement, customary law, dispute settlement, land of labe pura
Ingin dibuatkan seperti ini??
Butuh versi lengkap??
Atau ada tugas-tugas costum lainnya??
Silahkan Hubungi geraijasa.com di no wa 082138054433